Braves Starter Spencer Strider is In The Hunt For The NL Cy Young But Will He Win?

Atlanta Braves strikeout machine Spencer Strider is in a close run four-horse race for the NL Cy Young Award. He’ll win the NL strikeout race, set a new franchise record for strikeouts, and could win 20 games.

Atlanta Braves starting pitcher Spencer Strider is in the running for the NL Cy Young Award
Atlanta Braves starting pitcher Spencer Strider is in the running for the NL Cy Young Award / Brett Davis-USA TODAY Sports
2 of 2
Next

The game’s changed, and relievers are picking up wins for getting as little as one out, so 20 wins alone won’t mean much. Voters look to ERA, FIP, and a host of assorted metrics to decide their vote.

However, this year’s voters have a problem because the most used metrics contradict each other. Voters must make their decision based on who the pitcher posted numbers against and what it meant when he pitched: the dreaded eye test. Shocking, isn’t it?

The Voters’ Dilemma

On the 18th, Rob Mains penned (or typed, I guess) The Advanced Stats Don’t Always Agree. And That’s Just Fine for Baseball Prospectus, discussing some of the specific issues voters faced when considering the pitchers most talked about in the media.

I’ve said often over the years that leaning heavily on one statistic for anything is a bad idea. Mains explains why using four stats related to pitching that factor into the flavors of WAR (rWAR, fWAR, WARP): FIP-, ERA+, DRA-, and xERA. (Emphasis added is mine.)

The four advanced metrics—and the valuation statistics based on them—all measure pitcher quality. But …in slightly different ways. That’s fine. Each imparts information. That’s not a flaw, …They’re all valuable. They’re all imperfect. They all have their place.
The fact that they don’t all agree on (pitchers)? Think of it as a feature, not a bug.
Rob Mains

I have suggestions for the voters. They will, of course, ignore them, but I’ll lay out the case for my choice by looking at what and how the pitchers performed with no further notice WAR for pitchers.

Who is the best pitcher in the league?

Earlier in September, Dan Epstein wrote that Blake Snell’s Cy Young Case Doesn’t Pass the Sniff Test because his 13.5% walk rate is the worst for a starting pitcher in the MLB. He got away with all those walks because of an 86.2% strand rate. Because he’s flawed, voters will look for an easy-to-understand number they can write about that fans will understand.

There are five pitchers with numbers better than Snell who are having a season significant enough to get some attention and play for teams who have a postseason spot locked up or are in the hunt. ; Strider, Zac Galen, Justin Steele, Logan Webb, and Zach Wheeler.

The Candidates

Steele’s 3.00 ERA is second to Snell, and his 69% QS is second only to Logan Webb’s 72. He isn’t a strikeout pitcher (24.5%), but his 5% walk rate – a number he shares with Wheeler, is the lowest in the group.

Webb’s 22.9% K-rate is the lowest in the group, but he walks a minuscule 3.8% of batters, and his 72% QS rate and 3.35 ERA over 207 innings. I don’t understand why no one’s talking about Webb. Well, I do, he’s not flashy, and the Giants aren’t winning, but Webb’s had a great season.

Galen’s has a disappointing second half, and the law of recency will likely end his chances.

We know Wheeler pretty well, he strikes out 27.2%, walks 5%, and pitched to a 3.63 ERA over 181 innings so far. He’ll get votes, but there’s not a lot of noise around him.

Strider has the strikeouts and the style. Everyone except his opponents likes to watch him pitch. His 37.9% K rate reminds me of Nolan Ryan when he burst onto the scene, but he walks 7% of batters. The Atlanta Braves feed off of his energy, and unlike some power arms, he’s quickly learning to pitch rather than throw,

The Case For Strider

If voters want to find a reason they can write about when they vote for Strider, they could look at statistics that look at his situational pitching, SIERA, and DRA.

Fangraphs’ Skill-Interactive ERA and Baseball Prospectus Deserved Run Average and DRA-. Both stats look beyond ERA in an attempt to determine how much a pitcher does to limit runs. Follow the links to get a better understanding of what and how they measure performance. 

SIERA and DRA are expressed like ERA. DRA- is similar to ERA- in that lower numbers are better. A DRA- of 84 means the pitcher performed 16% better than the league.

Playe

SIERA/RK

DRA / RK

DRA- / RG

Galen

3.72 / 7th

3.98 / 7th

84 / 6th

Snell

4.08 /12th

4.46 / 25th

95 / 24th

Steele

3.63 / 5th

3.80 / 4th

81 /4th

Strider

2.78 / 1st

3.35 / 1st

71 / 1st

Webb

3.21 / 2nd

3.50 / 2nd

74 / 2nd

Wheeler

3.52 / 4th

3.64 / 3rd

77 / 3rd

Writers Like A Simple Number

This is wrong tool. No. No. Not good. No. No. Never use this."
-- Zathras in Babylon 5

I started by saying that wins don’t mean as much now, but in times like this, wins matter. I said WAR of any flavor is only one statistic and, by itself, doesn’t give you all of the information needed to vote, but fans know what it is; rather, they know what they think it is.

…of the last 20 award winners, 13 led the league in rWAR, 11 in wins, and ten in ERA….Strikeouts and innings leaders won the honor six and five times, indicating that voters pay some attention to them (even) though the more innings a pitcher throws, the more counting stats he’s likely to accrue.
Dan Epstein, linked above.

In other words, I expect writers to talk about wins, WAR, strikeouts, and ERA when explaining their vote.

That’s a Wrap

I’m staring at a lot of things that suggest Steele has an excellent chance of winning. Without him, the Cubs are getting tee times set up for October. The same is true of Strider’s contribution to the Atlanta Braves Season, and without Webb, the Giants are done by July.

I’d love to see Strider when a Cy Young, but I don't think it will happen this year. But the vote will be close, and any of the six candidates listed could win. All we can do is wait and hope Strider does something spectacular in his next two starts.

Next