Atlanta Braves: Busy Shopping Next Off-Season?
More Player Movement Via Trade
It used to be easy to understand. Give your pending free agent a Qualifying Offer (QO), and your team gets a 1st Round (sandwich) pick when he signs with another club.
The signing club loses their first-available draft pick – the only exception being if they have a protected Top-10 pick. That was the entire scheme.
Well, once teams decided that those draft picks were more valuable than the marginal-QO players, that system became a “change at all costs” part of the new CBA.
Hang with me on this next bit…
Here’s how Free Agent Compensation works now:
- Qualifying Offers still exist, though a player can only be tagged with one once – ever.
- $50 million is the price of importance for new contracts made with QO players
- Teams are ranked as (A) luxury tax violators; (B) revenue sharing recipients; or (C) neither. These categories determine payment and compensation for free agents won or lost.
As you look through the rest, note that the Atlanta Braves will be a (C) Club.
If a QO guy signs for $50 million-plus, then…
- Losing team: gains a new draft pick at end of (A) 4th, (B) 1st, or (C) 2nd rounds
- Signing team: loses (A) 2nd & 5th round picks plus $1 million of International pool money; (B) 3rd round pick only; (C) 2nd highest available pick and $500K of International money.
if a QO guy signs for under $50 million, then…
- Losing team: (A) gets end-of-4th round draft pick; while both (B) and (C) get end of 2nd round picks.
- Signing team: same as above
Suppose a team signs 2 QO guys?
- (A) teams: the above penalty, plus loss of 3rd and 6th highest draft picks and another $1 million of International pool money.
- (B) teams: the above penalty, plus loss of 4th highest draft pick.
- (C) teams: the above penalty, plus 3rd highest draft pick and another $500K of International pool money.
Competitive Balance picks – which are tradable – are exempt from loss via this scheme. A team might, however, gain AND lose picks via multiple free agent transaction in a single year.
Let’s Get Practical
Here is Exhibit A to illustrate the trouble teams will now have:
Bryce Harper plays for the Nationals, a Class C team (my designation) by this reckoning. Harper will be a free agent after the 2018 season.
If they lose him, the Nationals would stand to receive an end-of-the-second-round draft pick… probably around 65th-70th overall.
So if you’re the Nationals, what do you do? Hold him for that pick or trade him after 2017 in the hopes of getting 2-3 premium prospects?
Tough decision – if you’re still expecting to be contending in 2018 – but after getting Adam Eaton this winter, the Nats might want to cash in their trade chip while they can.
That’s the scenario the new CBA is creating: one in which more trades should be encouraged among teams that won’t get back that 1st rounder any longer.
All of that to say this: while the post-2017 free agent market will be better than the one we’re in right now, it could be flooded with extra players as teams realize the draft-pick math involved.