Analyzing Pitching Requirements for the Atlanta Braves
Forming Some Answers
More from Tomahawk Take
- What would a Max Fried extension look like?
- Braves News: Dansby to the Red Sox?, Braves top prospects, more
- Atlanta Braves 2023 Preseason Top 30 Prospects List: 26-30
- Atlanta Braves Rumors: Red Sox Interested in Dansby Swanson
- Can the Atlanta Braves still afford Dansby Swanson?
If you were trying to add that much pitching, how would you accomplish this? There should be some goals in mind:
- Add a #1 or #2 starter to take the pressure off of…well, all three of the incumbents.
- Add a solid “innings eater” for the back end to insure that 4th or 5th day isn’t a “hold your breath” game that destroys the bullpen.
- Add someone willing to be stashed at AAA for spot-starting purposes.
These would be the baseline goals. Anything more would be gravy. It would allow new pitchers to complement and support the 3 already here and allow rookies to earn their way in over time without needing to make an immediate impact.
That’s certainly consistent with this remark from Dave O’Brien:
"What the Braves don’t want to do again is watch multiple young starting pitchers going the trial-by-fire course, getting knocked around mercilessly or coming apart at the first sign of adversity. They love their young pitching, but want to make sure they can develop it at a proper pace while waiting for the elite arms to arrive in coming years."
Julio Teheran is going nowhere. Mike Foltynewicz and Matt Wisler have now established themselves are major league staters, having mostly worked through their own trials-by-fire. It does not make sense to dismiss, demote, or otherwise dispense with any of these if the Braves are intent on adding additional support.
It is instead the Aaron Blairs, John Gants, Tyrell Jenkinses, or as future rookies the Chris Ellises, Sean Newcombs, Lucas Simses of the world that this scheme aims to protect. That is the point of Coppy’s plan.
So there is an answer for Question 1. But that’s the easy question.